By Dan Pool, Editor
An article in the New York Times recently caught my attention about how most everyone is resistant to change.
The article, Why Trying New Things Is So Hard to Do by Sendhil Mullainathan, gave an example of trying, just once, a cheaper food product of something you regularly consume. If you judge it to be as good or better than your standard, then you save thousands over the rest of your life. And if the taste is appalling, all you are out is a couple of bucks. Huge potential upside with almost no cost of failure.
The article also offered an example of places to eat. You have a favorite, but maybe there is somewhere you would like better or something that is almost as good and cheaper or healthier. But when it’s time to eat out you go to the same handful of places and most likely order the same thing. At the McDonald’s drive-thru it’s always “the number 1.”
The article argues that people stick with the same-old-same-old largely because it’s easy. You don’t have to engage the brain if you never look for something different. Change causes upheaval, which might cause work.
While this article was directed to individuals, it hits the bullseye with the way we too-often operate in Pickens County.
“The way we have always done it,” makes a pretty standard answer and is much easier than shaking things up.
Our school board hired a new superintendent who brought years of experience in the local system. Yet, instead of embracing the status quo, Supt. Carlton Wilson has essentially said anything is up for discussion. From the length of the school year to which grades are grouped together, it’s all subject to adjustment.
Hats-off to him and the school board for embracing a philosophy that is open to new ideas. The plan to shuffle grades around appears to have direct financial and, hopefully, academic rewards. No, the idea of cutting back the number of days in the school year didn’t seem right at this point.
Same to the city of Jasper, while the dust is still settling over the chaos in city hall, there is nothing wrong at looking at how you operate. If a better path, system or manager is found, great. If not, we can always go back to what has been in place for most of the past 50 years. Just because it’s the way we have always done it, doesn’t mean there’s not a better system.
Needless to say, with both the schools and governments there is a lot riding on their decisions. Unlike soda decisions or fast food, with school remodeling or hiring city managers there could be massive downsides for a poor decision. Clearly more planning and input is required, but open discussion remains worthwhile.
We’d encourage all our government bodies to be open to calculated risk-taking, particularly our county government, which appears to pride itself on stability over innovation. We are not advocating change for change’s sake, but also not maintaining status quo simply because that’s the way it’s always been.
We surely don’t want to scrap systems on a whim that have served us well, but in 2018 it would be nice to see some thinking outside the box.