Get Adobe Flash player

City of Jasper and County should get together more often

Last week, county commissioners held a called joint meeting with Jasper City Council and Mayor John Weaver to discuss details about the Grandview Lake reservoir project. Nothing unusual there, right? It makes sense for two government entities to meet about one of the most important developments in Pickens County’s water supply in decades, right? 

Of course it makes sense for them to meet, but this meeting of the minds was highly, highly unusual - we can’t recall a single time county and city officials have met publicly to discuss anything, just the two of them, in at least 10 years. This fact was pointed out by two council members that night. Council member Sonny Proctor encouraged similar meetings in the future, while council member Kirk Raffield called it an “historic” event he hasn’t seen in his lifetime, going so far as to ask for a group photo to document it.  We spoke with a person closely involved in the project and he called the discussion “excellent,” commenting that having two government bodies hash out ideas and differing opinions is the “best way to do business.”  

We agree, and we’re honestly not sure how the city and the county have functioned so long without getting together. Jasper was identified at the recent Comprehensive Planning meetings as the driving force in Pickens County, with most commerce and infrastructure located inside the city limits, and there needs to be open and frequent communication between them and the county. Like Raffield said, “These two entities sitting together, things can only get better for our community. This group serves one community. That’s important for us to remember.” 

The benefit of such a meeting was made apparent not 10 minutes into discussion when some long-held misunderstandings were cleared up about the Grandview Lake project. The mayor thought the county wanted to sell water they will draw from the lake to customers inside the city’s service delivery area, which was not the case and resolved in a matter of seconds. 

A few examples of where more frequent discussion between the two entities could be beneficial are: 

• Parks - the city has one woefully underused park (Doris Wigington) in dire need of improvements, and the county has a park (Roper) that’s always too crowded;

• Road problems inside Bethany Moorings subdivision, which are currently located in the county but because of a complicated lawsuit are slated to be annexed into the city;

• Sewage treatment, which the county doesn’t have, and which the city wants to expand its facility but is struggling to justify the massive cost at this point.

The fact that a council member wanted to take a photo at last week’s meeting to document the unusual occurrence is telling. By no means are we proponents of meetings for the sake of having meetings (heaven knows we attend too many ourselves), but periodic meetings between city and county leaders including planning and development directors and other department heads can do nothing but good things for our community.